![]() ![]() Hence, the TI4200 is about as SLOW as you want to go for a good gaming experince.įor a $90~125 card, its still a good deal. Some show FPS from the 50s going down to 16fps! OUCH! If I may ask, where have you seen the fx5200 play nice with a modern game? Screenshots are easy, they are not moving.Ĭheck out these Ti4200 UT2003 screen shots: I get 50~80fps on my UT2003, 75% graphic detail - Anymore makes the game sluggish. In games like UT2003 & Unreal - where YOU need some graphic power, you want a healthy 60fps AVG (This could still drop to the low 30s on certain parts of the game - so you NEED this headroom). ![]() The end result? What the point of buying it?Īs stated, TI4200 smokes the fx5200 & 5600. You turn off ALL the details and lower the RES to 640x480, for which the graphics then look horrible. With a typical system, it would be lucky to break 20fps. These parameters indirectly speak of GeForce FX 5200 and GeForce4 Ti 4200s performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results. but like the Ti4200 with FSAA, the frame rate is UNPLAYABLE. GeForce FX 5200 and GeForce4 Ti 4200s general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. why yes, the Ultra5200 is faster than the Ti4200 (ONLY) with FSAA turned on. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |